Move a piece of work forward.
An organisational challenge, a research question or a service to develop. Find the contribution IAE can make.
Find support for your workIndependent medicines access, evidence and regulatory advice
Decisions about medicines access rarely sit with one team. IAE helps sponsors, providers and research commissioners assess the options, clarify responsibilities and turn a defined decision into a practical plan.
An organisational challenge, a research question or a service to develop. Find the contribution IAE can make.
Find support for your workUnderstand the terms, identify who can answer and prepare a useful next question.
Find information and signpostingHelp shape a conversation, highlight a recurring barrier or explore a community contribution.
Explore ways to contributeThe IAE approach
The most consequential gaps often sit between well-defined pieces of work.
A route can be plausible while the handover is unresolved. Data can be available while the evidence question is unclear. IAE makes those connections visible, assesses the options and turns the agreed direction into work that sponsors, providers, researchers and healthcare teams can use.
The right depth of support, organised around the programme and the decision in front of you.
Access strategy, programme design and post-trial planning, with the regulatory, supply and governance decisions brought together.
Explore medicines accessEvidence planning and research governance that connect scientific purpose, feasible collection and the people taking part.
Explore evidence & researchRegulatory leadership, quality and GxP governance, provider oversight and supply transitions that make the agreed strategy workable.
Explore regulatory governanceThe IAE Decision Room
The IAE Decision Room explores three fictional industry situations. Change an assumption, inspect the reasoning and see how the proposed next step changes. Each example includes a worked decision brief and an illustrative output, available without registration.
Original fictional industry scenarios. They illustrate decisions, not client assignments or delivered outcomes.
One team plans for existing study participants; another expects new requests. The provider has priced a narrower scope. Which programme should the organisation assess?
Explore the programme decisionA collection plan could describe people’s experience or try to compare outcomes. Which question does the evidence need to answer, and what would change in the design?
Explore the evidence decisionThe pack is prepared and people are available. What must be agreed and evidenced before the receiving organisation can accept the responsibilities?
Explore the provider decisionRead “A good plan needs a shared understanding” in Access in the Open.
Direct senior input
I help organisations make complex decisions about medicines access and evidence, then put those decisions into practice.
Daniel brings senior regulatory leadership together with a background in clinical academic research. His experience connects international access programmes, post-trial transitions, real-world evidence planning and regulatory governance.
IAE’s advice is independent of a medicine supply or logistics sale. The scope is shaped around your programme.
Meet Daniel and the approachCommunity & participation
Patients’ and families’ perspectives should help shape the work. Bring a recurring question, an experience that deserves attention or an idea for shared learning. There is a place to contribute without becoming a client.
Explore community participationGeneral information and signposting. Treatment-access requests remain with the official company or programme channels.
Tell Daniel what you are planning, what has changed or the decision you need to make. A short outline is enough to start.
Speak with DanielScope, responsibilities and fees are agreed before work begins.